Bitget vs BingX — fees & conditions
Bitget vs BingX: fees, withdrawal costs, products, licenses, security record and support side by side — every value linked to its official source.
Data reviewed byJason Lee About us → Bitget leads on trust & regulation; BingX leads on fees
This is a mechanical count of per-row results with no weights and no composite score. Which exchange suits you depends on which rows matter to you.
Bitget vs BingX in brief
- Spot trading: both charge 0.1% maker and 0.1% taker, so a $1,000 taker order costs $1.00 on either.
- Futures: Bitget charges 0.02% maker and 0.06% taker, BingX charges 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker — $0.60 vs $0.50 for a $1,000 taker order.
- Maximum futures leverage: 150× on Bitget, 150× on BingX.
- Both require identity verification (KYC) before trading.
- Counting row by row: BingX leads on fees (2 of 8 compared rows), products & features is even, Bitget leads on trust & regulation (1 of 3 compared rows), and access & support has too little confirmed data to call.
- 5 of 21 scored rows are left uncompared because a value is not yet confirmed from an official source.
Every sentence is generated from the values in the table below — nothing is added that the data does not show.
| Item | Bitget | BingX |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | ||
| Spot maker | 0.100% ↗ | 0.100% ↗ |
| Spot taker | 0.100% ↗ | 0.100% ↗ |
| Futures maker | 0.020% ↗ | 0.020% ↗ |
| Futures taker | 0.060% ↗ | 0.050%✓ ↗ |
| Cost of a $1,000 spot taker trade | $1.00 ↗ | $1.00 ↗ |
| Cost of a $1,000 futures taker trade | $0.60 ↗ | $0.50✓ ↗ |
| Fee discount with platform token | 20% ↗ BGB | No platform token |
| BTC withdrawal fee | 0.00002 BTC✓ ↗ | 0.00004 BTC ↗ |
| USDT withdrawal fee | 1.5 USDT ↗ | 1.5 USDT ↗ |
| Products & features | ||
| Listed coins | 600 ↗ | Not disclosed |
| Max futures leverage | 150× ↗ | 150× ↗ |
| Copy trading | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| Earn / staking | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| Fiat deposit methods | Card · Bank transfer · P2P · Third-party ↗ | Card · Bank transfer · P2P · Third-party ↗ |
| API trading | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| Mobile app | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| Trust & regulation | ||
| Licenses & registrations | 6✓ Bulgaria, Italy, Poland, Lithuania, El Salvador, Australia | 2 Lithuania, Australia |
| Recorded security incidents | Not confirmed | 1 2024 |
| Proof of reserves | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| User protection fund | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| KYC required | Yes ↗ | Yes ↗ |
| Founded | 2018 ↗ | 2018 ↗ |
| Headquarters | Seychelles (registered entity; operates without a single headquarters) ↗ | Not disclosed |
| Access & support | ||
| Interface languages | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Live chat support | Not confirmed | Yes ↗ |
| Users (exchange’s own claim) | 120M ↗ | 40M ↗ |
Green marks the better value in each row: lower fee, more coins, feature present. Rows without a mark are informational only. Unconfirmed values are never compared.
How these numbers were read
Bitget — Base VIP level (all thresholds ≥ 0). No BGB discount applied. Official fee page. Withdrawal fees from Bitget public spot coins API (withdrawFee): BTC on the native BTC chain 0.00003 BTC (Lightning 0.00001); USDT on TRC20 1.5 USDT (BEP20/Arbitrum/Optimism 0.15, ERC20 0.8 at the same snapshot). [Withdrawal fees checked 2026-10-28 via public API: BTC 0.00002 BTC on BTC (cheapest: BEP20 2.9e-7); USDT 1.5 USDT on TRC20 (cheapest: BEP20 0.01). The exchange adjusts them with network conditions.]
BingX — VIP 0 / regular user, no VIP discount. Spot: 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker (VIP 0 row of the live Fee Schedule page bingx.com/en/support/costs, read in-browser 2026-09-23; the BingX Learn article states the same). USDT-margined perpetual futures: 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker (support article Perpetual Futures Fee Schedule). Standard Futures use a flat 0.045% on close instead. BingX has no platform token. Max leverage 150x is for BTC-USDT crypto perpetuals (Oct 2022 announcement); BingX also lists forex perpetuals up to 500x, excluded here as non-crypto. Shield Fund: 1,000 BTC + 4,000 ETH + 40M USDT self-funded user-protection reserve. Earn: About page lists a Wealth section (Loan, Dual Investment). Regulation from the support article "BingX License Information" (Lithuania FCIS registration, AUSTRAC DCE); the MiCAR application to the Austrian FMA (support article 16497944445327) is pending and not listed. HQ left null: official pages list branch offices (North America, Canada, EU, Singapore) but no headquarters. listed_coins left null: About page states "1,100+ trading pairs", not a coin count. Withdrawal fees from the official Fee Schedule > Deposits & Withdrawals page: BTC 0.00004 BTC on the Bitcoin network (BEP20 0.000001); USDT 1.5 USDT on Tron (TRC20) (ERC20 1; cheapest Aptos 0.01). Withdrawal fees checked 2026-09-23; the exchange adjusts them with network conditions. Re-verified 2026-10-19 by weekly review in-browser: Fee Schedule bingx.com/en/support/costs Spot "VIP 0" 0.1000% taker / 0.1000% maker; Perpetual Futures Fee Schedule article "Maker (pending orders): 0.02%", "Taker (filled instantly): 0.05%". Unchanged.
More from Reviewer’s Insight
Bitget vs BingX in brief
Which is cheaper for spot trading, Bitget or BingX?
Both charge the same spot fees: 0.1% maker and 0.1% taker.
Which has lower futures fees, Bitget or BingX?
BingX has the lower futures taker fee (0.05% vs 0.06% on Bitget). Maker fees are 0.02% on BingX and 0.02% on Bitget.
Do Bitget and BingX require KYC?
Both require identity verification (KYC) before trading.
Which has lower withdrawal fees, Bitget or BingX?
BTC withdrawal: 0.00002 BTC on Bitget vs 0.00004 BTC on BingX. USDT withdrawal: 1.5 USDT on Bitget vs 1.5 USDT on BingX.
Which is more regulated, Bitget or BingX?
Bitget has 6 recorded license(s) or registration(s); BingX has 2. A license count is not a safety score.
Every answer is generated from the values above and their official sources — nothing is added that the data does not show.